PRESIDENTIALIZATION AND PROCEDURAL RULES CHANGE: THE CASE OF THE SOUTH KOREAN NATIONAL ASSEMBLY

The common assumption of legislative politics is that the majority party structures procedural rules to suit its interests. In a presidentialized context, however, presidential electoral incentives prevail over majority party's incentives when voting on procedural rules changes and the threat of punishing majority-party defectors is not credible when those defectors vote with the presidential candidate. To test these claims, I analyze the case of the procedural reform in the South Korean National Assembly. The case study reveals that 1) the leading presidential candidate of the ruling majority Saenuri Party compromised on the procedural reform bill that imposes restrictions on the majority party's cartel arrangement due to presidential electoral incentives; 2) a significant number of Saenuri Party members defected from the majority of their co-partisans to vote with the presidential candidate; and 3) career advancement ratio and re-nomination ratios demonstrate that those defectors were not punished afterwards.

Keywords

Type Article Information Journal of East Asian Studies , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , March 2019 , pp. 111 - 129 Copyright © East Asia Institute 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aldrich , John A. and Rohde , David W. . 1998 . “Measuring Conditional Party Government.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar

Binder , Sarah . 1996 . “ The Partisan Basis of Procedural Choice: Allocating Parliamentary Rights in the House, 1789–1991 .” American Political Science Review 90 ( 1 ): 8 – 20 .Google Scholar

Binder , Sarah . 1997 . “ Partisanship and Procedural Choice: Institutional Change in the Early Congress, 1789–1823 .” Journal of Politics 57 ( 4 ): 1093 – 1118 .Google Scholar

Binder , Sarah , and Smith , Steven S. . 1998 . “ Political Goals and Procedural Choice in the Senate .” Journal of Politics 60 ( 2 ): 398 – 416 .Google Scholar

Chung , Jinmin . 2013 . “ The Revision of National Assembly Act and the 19th National Assembly: Focusing on Parliamentary Party and Presidential-Legislative Relations. ” Journal of Contemporary Politics 6 ( 1 ): 5 – 29 [in Korean].Google Scholar

Cox , Gary C. , and McCubbins , Mathew D. . 1993 . Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House . Berkeley : University of California Press .Google Scholar

Cox , Gary C. , and McCubbins , Mathew D. . 1997 . “ Toward a Theory of Legislative Rules Changes: Assessing Schickler and Rich's Evidence .” American Journal of Political Science 41 ( 4 ): 1376 – 1386 .Google Scholar

Cox , Gary C. , and McCubbins , Mathew D. . 2005 . Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives . New York : Cambridge University Press .Google Scholar

Eckstein , Harry . 1975 . “ Case Studies and Theory in Political Science ” In Handbook of Political Science: Political Science: Scope and Theory , vol. 7, edited by Greenstein , Fred I. and Polsby , Nelson W. , 94 – 137 . Reading, MA : Addison-Wesley .Google Scholar

Fink , Evelyn C. 2000 . “ Representation by Deliberation: Changes in the Rules of Deliberation in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1789–1844 .” Journal of Politics 62 ( 4 ): 1109 – 1125 .Google Scholar

Horiuchi , Yusaku , and Lee , Seungjoo . 2008 . “ The Presidency, Regionalism, and Distributive Politics in South Korea .” Comparative Political Studies 41 ( 6 ): 861 – 882 .Google Scholar

Jaung , Hoon . 2015 . “ The Historical Origins of Frail Party Politics in South Korea .” Journal of Parliamentary Research 10 ( 2 ): 315 – 348 .Google Scholar

Jenkins , Jeffrey A. , Crespin , Michael H. and Carson , Jamie . 2005 . “ Parties as Procedural Coalitions in Congress: An Examination of Differing Career Paths .” Legislative Studies Quarterly 30 ( 3 ): 365 – 389 .Google Scholar

Jeon , Jin Young . 2015 . “ Does the Revision of National Assembly Reform the 19th National Assembly? ” Journal of Contemporary Politics 8 ( 1 ): 99 – 125 [in Korean].Google Scholar

Jeon , Jin Young . 2018 . “ Speaker's Institutional Power and Partisan Role in the National Assembly of Korea. ” Journal of Parliamentary Research 13 ( 1 ): 211 –31 [in Korean].Google Scholar

Kim , In-Young . 2015 . “ A Critical Evaluation on the Debates of the National Assembly Revision Act .” Journal of Korean Political and Diplomatic History 37 ( 1 ): 75 – 100 . [in Korean]Google Scholar

Kim , Junseok . 2014 . “ Testing a Hypothesis of Lame-Duck Voting in the 18th National Assembly. ” Korean Political Science Review 48 ( 4 ): 225 – 247 [in Korean].Google Scholar

King , Gary , Keohane , Robert , and Verba , Sidney . 1994 . Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research . Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press .Google Scholar

Kwon , Hyeok Yong . 2005 . “ Targeting Public Spending in a New Democracy: Evidence from South Korea, 1988–97 .” British Journal of Political Science 35 ( 2 ): 321 – 341 .Google Scholar

Lee , Han Soo . 2014 . “ Evaluating the 19th Korean National Assembly: Revision of National Assembly Law and Legislative Activities .” Korean Journal of Legislative Studies 20 ( 2 ): 5 – 38 . [in Korean]Google Scholar

Lee , Hyunchool . 2014 . “ The Appraisal of National Assembly Advancement Act. ” Journal of Contemporary Politics 7 ( 2 ): 5 – 34 [in Korean].Google Scholar

Lee , Nae Young , and Lee , Hojun . 2015 . “ Party Polarization in the South Korean National Assembly: An Analysis of Roll-Call Votes in the 16–18th National Assembly. ” Journal of Parliamentary Research 10 ( 2 ): 25 – 54 [in Korean].Google Scholar

Lee , Sang Sin . 2015 . “ The Revisions of National Assembly Act in 2012 and Gridlock in South Korea. ” Journal of Future Politics 5 ( 1 ): 69 – 86 [in Korean].Google Scholar

Moon , Myunghak , and Lee , Hyeon-Woo . 2016 . “ Practical Meaning of Selection Rules of Chairs of the Standing Committees in the Korean National Assembly. ” Korean Journal of Legislative Studies 22 ( 1 ): 81 – 117 [in Korean].Google Scholar

Moon , Woojin . 2011 . “ Party Voting and Party Loyalty in Multiparty Party Systems: An Analysis of Roll Call Data from the 17th and the Early 18th National Assemblies. ” Korean Journal of Legislative Studies 17 ( 2 ): 5 – 40 [in Korean].Google Scholar

Park , Chan Pyo . 2012 . “ A Study on the rules change in the 18 th National Assembly. ” Korean Journal of Legislative Studies 18 ( 3 ): 39 – 71 [in Korean].Google Scholar

Park , Chan Pyo . 2016 . “ A Study on the Development of Procedural Rules of National Assembly. ” Journal of Contemporary Politics 9 ( 1 ): 75 – 113 [in Korean].Google Scholar

Park , Kyungmee . 2010 . “ Party Mergers and Splits in New Democracies: The Case of South Korea, 1987–2007 .” Government and Opposition 45 ( 4 ): 531 – 552 .Google Scholar

Park , Yun Hee . 2014 . “ A Comparative Analysis on the Passage of the Legislators’ Bills in the 17th–18th National Assembly Standing Committee: A Focus on the Theory of Committee. ” Journal of Korean Politics 23 ( 2 ): 235 – 261 [in Korean].Google Scholar

Press , Daryl G. 2005 . Calculating Credibility: How Leaders Assess Military Threats . Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press .Google Scholar

Samuels , David J. 2002 . “ Presidentialized Parties: The Separation of Powers and Party Organization and Behavior .” Comparative Political Studies 35 ( 4 ): 461 – 483 .Google Scholar

Samuels , David J. , and Shugart , Matthew S. . 2010 . Presidents, Parties, and Prime Ministers: How Separation of Powers Affects Party Organization and Behavior . New York, NY : Cambridge University Press .Google Scholar

Schickler , Eric . 2000 . “ Institutional Change in the House of Representatives, 1867–1998: A Test of Partisan and Ideological Power Balance Models .” American Political Science Review 94 ( 2 ): 269 – 288 .Google Scholar

Schickler , Eric , and Rich , Andrew . 1997 a “ Controlling the Floor: Parties as Procedural Coalitions in the House. ” American Journal of Political Science 41 ( 4 ): 1340 – 1375 .Google Scholar

Schickler , Eric , and Rich , Andrew . 1997 b. “ Party Government in the House Reconsidered: A Response to Cox and McCubbins .” American Journal of Political Science 41 ( 4 ): 1387 – 1394 .Google Scholar

Shin , Jae Hyeok . 2013 . “ Voter Demands, Access to Resources, and Party Switching: Evidence from the South Korean National Assembly, 1988–2008 .” Japanese Journal of Political Science 14 ( 4 ): 453 – 472 .Google Scholar

Shin , Jae Hyeok , and Lee , Hojun . 2017 . “ Legislative Voting Behaviour in the Regional Party System: An Analysis of Roll-Call Votes in the South Korean National Assembly, 2000–8 .” Government and Opposition 52 ( 3 ): 437 – 459 .Google Scholar

Tomz , Michael , Wittenberg , Jason , and King , Gary . 2003 . “ Clarify: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results. ” Journal of Statistical Software 8 ( 1 ).Google Scholar